A mum has vowed to contest a ₤ 100 fine after declaring an environmental enforcer saw her struggle with her young kid prior to she might tidy up after her dog.
Susie Foley, 35, was putting her 18 month old daughter, Scarlett, into her pram when her pug pet dog, Stan, fouled in a public parking area near Fleetwood’s primary beach.Mrs Foley says the enforcement officer then approached and informed her that as the canine had fouled, and she had actually not cleaned up the mess “forthwith “, she was liable for a repaired penalty notice.The mum-of-one,
of Hawley Gardens, Thornton, argues that the enforcement officer did not provide her time to tidy up and was too fast to release her with the notice.But the environmental enforcement firm District Enforcement Ltd, acting upon behalf of Wyre Council, stated Mrs Foley did enable her pet dog to foul in a public location, on January 27, and did not attend to it.Wyre Council informed the shocked canine owner it had reviewed body-worn
video footage and backed the officer’s decision.Having unsuccessfully appealed against the fine by e-mail, Mrs Foley has actually now been cautioned she will be required to
court if she does not pay up by April 15. She said:”I was angry and upset since all the six years I have actually had my pet dog I have always cleaned up after him, I am an accountable owner.
” I have no issue with wardens fining people who simply permit their pets to foul public areas.”But this enforcement warden could see what was happening, I needed to put the security of my child first prior to I addressed the pet dog. “He did not even offer me an opportunity to deal with it, which is the aggravating thing.” If I am required to pay this fine I will pay it, but I am arguing about the principle of the thing.” Wyre has previously specified that homeowners throughout the borough have highlighted pet dog fouling in public spaces as a significant concern they wish to see tackled by the council.Last year the authority authorized a 12-month pilot scheme releasing Liverpool firm District Enforcement Ltd to combat ecological crime.Its officers are equipped with body-worn, high meaning electronic cameras to film video footage of wrong-doing in all cases where notices are handed out.After her appeal was refused Mrs Foley, who works as an administrator for plastics firm Victrex, contacted Wyre Council about the matter, hoping the council would relent because of the circumstances.But she states an ecological officer stated the official had actually acted fairly and within his remit, and refusal to pay might result in her being responsible for prosecution.A spokesman for District Enforcement Ltd stated:”We can not comment on this case as it is an ongoing examination.”Ought to the alleged transgressor fail to release their liability from prosecution by paying the fixed charge notice, the case will be referred to a magistrates’court.”It is very important to note that if any of our ecological crime officers observe a
member of the public stopping working to get after their pet dog, they will be provided with an on-the-spot fixed penalty notification of ₤ 100.
“All of our patrols are intelligence-led across the district of Wyre, which have resulted in the issuance of 35 repaired charge notifications for pet fouling since October 29, 2018.
“Wyre Council said it was aware of the matter but declined to comment.Tougher fines A 12-month deal remains in place that saw District Enforcement Ltd officers take to the streets of Wyre in October.At the very same time, fines for pet fouling were increased from ₤ 75 to ₤ 100. Ever since, the variety of fines handed out has risen sharply from 5 in 14 months to 38 in the four months since the pilot began.Wyre stated the offer is not about raising loan as it keep simply 12.5 per cent of the revenue.
This content was originally published here.